Search for: "S. G.1" Results 1 - 20 of 18,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2009, 7:31 am
As I mentioned in an earlier post, my online exchanges with T-Mobile support imply that T-Mobile does not object to my tethering my G-1, although they don't support it. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:43 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The referring Board asked about the applicability of the gold standard disclosure test as defined in decision G 2/10 to undisclosed disclaimers (no), and the applicability of criteria as defined in decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03 (yes). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:55 am by Matt Larsen
Section 922(g)(1) of Title 18 bars anyone ever convicted of any felony from ever possessing a gun. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:11 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
The Enlarged Board of Appeal has now issued its long-awaited full decision in case G 1/21. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:15 am by Theodore Chiacchio
The post Examining CAFC Application of §271(g)(1)’s ‘Materially Changed’ Exception to Infringement Liability appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:24 pm by Julie McGrain
The Third Circuit rejected Barton's challenges, holding that § 922(g)(1) was constitutional both on its face and as applied to Barton. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 7:30 am by Howard Bashman
“Third Circuit panel upholds constitutionality §922(g)(1)’s felon-in-possession gun prohibition after Bruen“: Douglas A. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 7:23 am by Rose Hughes
 AnalysisAs a first observation, the Board’s decision to accept the priorities can be regarded as an extreme interpretation of G 1/22. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 8:37 am by Shane McCall
I hope you will join Nicole Pottroff and I as we discuss the benefits of the SBA’s Mentor-Protégé Program. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:46 am by sally
Regina v S (G) [2012] WLR (D) 28 “The transmission of electronically stored data to only one recipient is sufficient publication with section 1(3) of the Obscene Publications Act 1959 for the purposes of a prosecution under that Act.” WLR Daily, 9th February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 1:41 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In this case, the Board referred questions to the Enlarged Board about the applicability of the gold standard disclosure test as defined in decision G 2/10 to undisclosed disclaimers (no), and the applicability of criteria as defined in decisions G 1/03 and G 2/03 (yes). [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 12:55 pm
  Wisconsin's modifications to the ABA Model Rule are slight and do not significantly weaken it.Importantly, the petition to adopt Rules 3.8(g)-(h) was filed by the Wisconsin District Attorney's Association. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Moreover, referring to G 2/98 (OJ EPO 2001, 413, Reasons, points 4, 6.6 and 6.7), the opposition division concluded that the "intermediate generalisation in granted claim 1 with respect to the disclosure of priority document D16 does not give rise to the claiming of a limited number of clearly defined alternative subject-matters" and thus that the "subject—matter of claim 1 was only entitled to the filing date". [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 3:51 pm
She was certainly aware by May 1, 1978, when she advised the Correctional Facility that she was willing to correspond and visit with Defendant that he was imprisoned. [read post]